The Pelican Brief by John Grisham

I read this for a Goodreads challeng--I picked it because I had just read a trio of Grisham books that came much later than this one (which was written in the early 1990's) and enjoyed them. The thing I didn't expect was that I would find it so relevant to the politics of 2026. So much corruption, so much graft and so much doing whatever they want. The grifters and the murderers have close ties with the President. SOund familiar? Apparently it is not new--Grisham wrote the play book and others are following it. Here's what happens. One morning America learns two Supreme Court justices have been murdered the previous night. Justice Rosenberg and Justice Jensen are different--one is reliably liberal and you could see the conservative president replacing him with someone who would shift the balance of the court, but the other is not, he is more likely to lean right, and the question arises who would have killed both of them. Law professor Thomas Callahan is heartbroken, but his brilliant student Darby Shaw sees the whole situation as a big puzzle. She starts preparing a legal brief (later to be called the Pelican Brief and you'll find out why) trying to find out who was behind the murders. Someone has to get advantage out of the deaths, and she studied an enormous amount of cases before she untangled the web of who is to gain. Darby gives her legal brief to Thomas, who then gives it to his llife long FBI friend, who spreads it widely. But the bried ends up ruffling feathers, the president squashes the investigation, but after Thomas is killed and Darby is on the run. This is more thriller than legal thriller, but it is well written, keeps the momentum up to the end, and again, it seems all too plausible.

Children Of The Bamboo Grove by Barbara Demick

A little over a year ago China quietly ended its three decades of international adoptions. This cessation came almost a decade after China—again quietly—put an end to its one-child policy, which also lasted more than three decades. While reporting from China for the LA Times, the author uncovered some difficult truths about international adoptions in a country that was supposed to be the among the most ethical in the world. She weaves the histories of both China’s one-child policy and Chinese international adoptions into the story of a pair of separated twins, making for a thrilling narrative that is hard to put down. Identical twins Fangfang and Shuangjie were born in a mountainous village in Hunan province, the third and fourth children in their family. Fangfang, the older of the twins, was a healthy baby, but Shuangjie was a little sickly and needed more care. Fearful of the local family planning office, the twins’ parents worried that they would be caught and punished for having more than one child. They already had a second daughter after their first was born, but they worried they would have a difficult time evading attention with twins. So, they sent Fangfang to live with her aunt and uncle. The author writes about two scandals that plagued Chinese adoptions. The first involved individuals trafficking babies and toddlers, taking them from their homes and bringing them to orphanages. The second involved government family planning offices doing the same. Both the individual traffickers and the family planning offices made massive amounts of money “facilitating” these adoptions to foreign parents. It is hard to know how common this was, and with DNA testing a lot more is being uncovered, but this is a fascinating read.

One Battle After Another (2025)

This is the movie of the year so far. It opens with the kind of momentum usually reserved for the climax of an action film and barely slows down from there. A revolutionary group known as French 75 is initiating an operation on the Mexico-U.S. border, where they take the officers hostage and release the immigrants awaiting processing. The group is led by Perfidia Beverly Hills (Teyana Taylor), a confident force of rageful nature who finds the leader, Colonel Steven J. Lockja, and sexually humiliates him before walking him out of the base. The encounter launches a psychosexual obsession with Perfidia, someone whom he sees as beneath him because he’s a racist monster, but someone who he also wants to sexually control him. He essentially stalks Perfidia as she continues to lead the resistance with her partner Bob Ferguson. When the two eventually have a child named Willa, Bob sees that they have to get out to protect the baby and Perfidia instead stays, gets caught, and burns everybody after Bob is safely put away in a small town. Cut to 16 years later, Willa is a teenager, and Bob is a single father, still doing what he can for the revolution but equally worried about taking care of his daughter. Lockjaw remains obsessed with the pair, initiating a series of raids and operations on French 75 members that forces Perfidia’s former ally Deandra into action, exfiltrating Willa from a high school dance. The end becomes a kind of chase scene, with excellent cinematography and a score to match. There is a lot to unpack here in terms of the culture clashes in present day, which seem remarkably similar to the days of old, and it is very well done.

Black Moses by Caleb Gayle

This was recommended by Jacqueline Woodson, author of Brown Girl Dreaming, and of course also by the National Book Award as well. It is about Edward Preston McCabe, who was born free to free parents, and who appears to be a classic success story of the Reconstruction period. In 1878, after stints as a clerk in New York and Chicago, he arrived at the forlorn town of Nicodemus, Kansas, and took over the local government. He enticed more settlers and helped to foster the town’s increasing prosperity. After two terms as state auditor, McCabe then lit out for the Oklahoma Territory, where he co-founded the town of Langston, played a prominent role in the founding of Langston University and served as the territory’s assistant auditor. In 1890, he met President Benjamin Harrison in the White House, where he angled for an appointment as territorial governor. But McCabe was a Black man in Jim Crow America, and while he appeared to have a lot of things going for him, the reach of his dreams of a place for black Americans to be in charge, to command their own fate, became too great a liability for white Americans. Racism shaped the contours of his ambition, and then it crushed him. The retelling of his life is one way for him to live on, which makes it extra important to read and know about.

Death Due To Misinformation

We have been here before, and apparently we the people are easily misled, and we will be here again. During the COVID pandemic I was surprised and at time shocked by the lack of understanding about what was happening. It seemed like very basic biology--understanidng why a messanger RNA vaccine would be a novel approach is harder to follow, but what a novel virus brought with it in terms of risks and challenges is a foundational block in a high school education. The move towards making vaccines optinal--and not covered by insurance--is going to kill people, mostly children and elderly people. It will also, very importantly, maim people. The ravages of surviving the damage from high fever have been largely forgotten by most, but will become very real. And not vaccinating against COVID, a virus that we do not yet fully understand but know that fully a third of people recovering from COVID have cognitive impairment and longer term damage that we do not yet know how to treat, and given the support for science in this administration, are unlikely to learn more about in the short term. I encourage you to stroll through some pre-vaccination era cemetaries and note how many children are buried there--I have started collecting photos of just this--because sadly, if the anti-vaccination trend continues, we will have children populating them once again.

Why Do We Keep Talking about 1930's Germany?

Because it seems so relavent. And also because whatever comes out of the president's mouth is the opposite of the truth--almost without fail. And sometimes it seems all too true, like this campaign video mentioning The Reich. The disappearing of people with brown skin, taken by people out of uniform and into unmarked cars to places we don't know--that sounds like people who the Nazi's found undesirable were sent away and murdered. So here goes: What is happening in America Actions against the judiciary: Concerns have been raised about actions and rhetoric that show a disregard for court decisions, including a instance where the Trump administration was held in criminal contempt for ignoring a court order. Attacks on the press: The press has been labeled as the "enemy of the people," a comparison that has drawn criticism. Civil Service and "Purge": There are concerns about plans to purge the civil service and replace bureaucrats with political loyalists, a move some have compared to Hitler's actions. Rhetoric and Legal Actions: Rhetoric concerning immigration has led to comparisons between immigration enforcement tactics and the Gestapo. Additionally, Trump has proposed using executive actions that some critics fear could be abusive, such as potentially suspending habeas corpus or using the Insurrection Act. Criminal Charges: Trump faced federal criminal charges for allegedly conspiring to defraud the government and obstruct the January 6 Capitol attack. "Dictator" Rhetoric: Trump has stated he would be a "dictator on day one" as a mode of governance, a statement that has been seen as concerning due to its potential for abuse. Where are we headed? Nazi Germany was responsible for systematic persecution, genocide during World War II, and crimes like massacres and forced labor. Comparisons to Donald Trump's America are often based on specific actions and rhetoric, such as attacks on the press and the judiciary, plans to remove federal employees, and rhetoric concerning immigration and potentially suspending legal protections like habeas corpus. azis used their state power, including the Gestapo (secret police), to persecute opponents and detain individuals without charge in concentration camps.

The Right To Peacefully Protest

.

We are exercising our first amendment right to free speech. I am a Daughter of the American Revolution, both sides of my family were in America before the war. We are a people who do not want to be ruled by dictators or kings. We are against the fascist government in power. They are male white supremacists, which is not illegal, but it is undesirable.

What does Fascism look like? The punch line is that we have a leader who has said and done every one of these things Forge alliances with elites. Fascist parties ally with powerful conservative groups, such as the wealthy and business owners, who fear a leftist or socialist revolution. These elites often believe they can control the new movement. In Italy in 1922, the king appointed Mussolini as prime minister after conservatives feared a civil war could break out. Subvert institutions. Once in power, the fascist leader works to dominate the government and dismantle democratic institutions. This can involve banning opposition parties and passing laws that consolidate power and eliminate oversight. Impose radical changes. With consolidated authority, the regime introduces radical changes. This may involve controlling the media, suppressing labor movements, and persecuting perceived enemies. The nation shifts towards extreme nationalism and totalitarian control. Propaganda and control of information: The government takes control of mass media to promote its ideology and create a culture of fear. Suppression of dissent: Opponents are silenced through imprisonment, violence, and intimidation. Militarism: The military is glorified, and violence is used to enforce control and settle political disputes.

Rhetoric On The Right: The Embracing of Opposite Day

An outspoken advocate for gun ownership was shot and killed at a speaking event on September 11th. Would he be okay with that? In 2023, following a mass shooting at the Christian Covenant School in Nashville, Tennessee, he stated, per Newsweek, “It’s worth to have a cost of, unfortunately, some gun deaths every single year so that we can have the Second Amendment.” The trade off for gun access and gun deaths is that people will die--and it can't always be other people, can it? In the US about 50,000 people die by guns every year, so "some" is a pretty big number. He was not advocating for the shooting of children, who are more likely to die from gun violence than any other cause, so it seems he accepted the risk, maybe better than those who advocate for more controls on guns. In the aftermath of the shooting death of a man who was known as a spokesman for widespread gun ownership in this country, there is a focus on the politics of advocating violence. The right wants to advocate violence against anyone who disagrees with them, and to vilify those who speak out against them. The current President uses a lot of violent rhetoric when talking about his opponents, and the very same week that Mr. Kirk was killed at a public event, he was threatening war on the city of Chicago. That is violent speech and imagery. Then I hear GOP politicians calling out the left--without attribution of source--for inciting violence. "Some on the American left are undoubtedly well-meaning people, but their ideology is pure evil,” Representative Bob Onder, Republican of Missouri, said on Thursday in a speech on the House floor. “They hate the good, the truth, and the beautiful, and embrace the evil, the false, and the ugly.” Calling people well-meaning but evil none-the-less because they disagree with you is what is bad, false, and ugly. Half of America doesn't agree with you, afterall, and that alone does not make them evil. It is that rhetoric, which incites strong feelings, which can lead to violence. So who is it inciting violence in acutality? Seems like the right--look in the mirror if you want to see the problem, Congressman Onder.

Opus: The Cult of Dark Money, Human Trafficking, and Right-Wing Conspiracy inside the Catholic Church

Spoiler alert--if you have been paying attention at all, there is nothing in here that is ground breaking. Shocking, yes. The depth of the corruption and how it has infiltrated our government and the governments of Europe is well laid out but on reflection, not surprising. The first thing to note about Opus is the tremendous amount of research that went into the project. This involved serious attention to many published works on the prelature, personal interviews with present and former members of Opus Dei (including significant leadership figures), and archival research materials. The resources are fully a quarter of the pages of the book. Some things I didn't know were that Opus Dei was founded in 1928 to be an association of mostly lay Catholics who would seek holiness through their daily activities and secular jobs. Most members are supernumeraries, which means they can be married and live independently, in their own homes; others are numeraries, making a promise of celibacy and living in Opus Dei centers in the community. The author started to investigate them because he was interested in the collapse of a Spanish bank in 2027--but it turned out that was literally the tip of the iceberg when it comes to the influence the group wields, and how Pope Francis was not under their sway being the sole bright light within. The author structures his book around three complementary narratives: one financial, one political and one ecclesial. He is on the strongest ground with following the money, and then where that leads in terms of political influence. It is pretty awful and demonstrates that we are very far from a separation of church and state.

The Othering of America

It is unacceptable. Our neighbors are being taken and we don't know where they are being taken. As we start our 249th year as a country, we are in the midst of a movement of "othering" black and brown people in general and immigrants specifically. ICE agents, wearing masks, tactile gear, semi-automatic weapons, and dark glasses, operating without badges or warrents are very similar to kidnappers. The "process of othering" involves categorizing people into groups and emphasizing differences to create a distinction between an "us" and a "them," often leading to the marginalization and stigmatization of the "them". This process frequently involves assigning negative stereotypes and reinforcing power imbalances. Here's a breakdown of the process: 1. Categorization: . Individuals or groups are categorized based on perceived differences, such as ethnicity, religion, gender, or other characteristics. 2. Othering: . This categorized group is then positioned as fundamentally different from the "in-group" or "us". 3. Dehumanization: . In extreme cases, this can lead to dehumanization, where the "othered" group is seen as less than human, potentially justifying discrimination, abuse, or even violence. 4. Reinforcement of Identity: . The process of othering helps solidify the identity of the "in-group" by defining itself in opposition to the "out-group". Othering can have serious consequences, including human rights violations, prejudice, and social exclusion. It is a common tactic used to justify conflict, discrimination, and violence. Understanding the mechanisms of othering is crucial for promoting inclusivity and challenging these harmful practices. Having just watched "I'm Still Here" about the disappeance of people the government wanted to silence in Brazil, I am struck by how many times history has repeated itself. The Nazi playbook holds a lot of appeal for the Republican party. It is time to do what they do, which is othering those who do not agree with them, calling them by labels that largely don't fit--as a twist on their playbook, just be truthful. Their policies are racist. They are White Supremacists. They are fascists. They disregard the Rule of Law. They are terrorists. Call your congress people and ask them to do their jobs, but know who they are. Morally bankrupt. There is no healing this, there is only protesting for the country that my ancestors founded.

Patriot by Alexei Navaltny

This is a tragedy in the form of a memoir. Alexei Navalny knew how it would end: “I’ll spend the rest of my life in prison and die here.” He was right. On 16 February 2024, the Russian authorities announced the death of its highest profile political prisoner in colony FKU IK-3, north of the Arctic Circle. He was 47 years old. By the time it was published we definitively knew the outcome--that Putin killed Navalny. He had after all tried once and failed. When Navalny recovered and returned to Russia, everyone knew where it was headed. In the meantime he demonstrated conclusively that the Russian state had put a hit on him. The documentary that chronicles this story is remarkable--it also shows why Navalny was so dangerous for Putin. He was a smart, charismatic and handsome man who was charming, self-effacing, and the leader that Russia needed and arguably at one point at least, deserved. Having watched the documentary that won the Academy Award in 2024 and followed Navalny's return to Russia, his imprisonment, and his slow death there, the front end of this memoir was more gripping for me. It tells Navalny's rise to a much feared opposition leader, which included he and his extended family being targeted by the Russian government. The depth of corruption in Putin's Russia and the corruption it thrives on is well detailed here and he is a good writer to boot. This is a difficult read, and one that is unlikely to change any minds, but well worth reading.

Pope Leo IVX--First American Pope

First things first. Since we all watched Conclave, we have some idea of the politics that were at work in the conclave that took place this week. If you missed the movie in the run up to the Oscars, you could watch it between Pope Francis' funeral and today. The debate around where the next pope would lie in terms of church doctrine and direction as well as where he would hail from were widely discussed. In terms of politics, the choice was more non-commital than decisive, and an American was a bit of a surprise. Some things to say--first, he is not that American. He lived in Peru for decades and has Peruvian citizenship. He is fluent in Spanish and Italian, so he can speak to much of the world's Catholics. Second, he is in N ugustinian order, meaning that he is not all about pomp and circumstance, he thinks all humans walk together, and he has a commitment to the poor. Third, he has a math and science education, and he has good leadership experience, and he might be smart. He is seen as a unifier and while not necessarily rooting for the church, it would be good for it not to go downhill and for it to mend fences. Lastly, he told Vance that he did not know what the hell he was talking about when he talked about Jesus--it was obvious to anyone who has read the New Testament that Vance was more in line with Pontious Pilate that Jesus, but it is good that the next pontiff let everyone who was in doubt know what he thought. So, not a terrible choice, it seems, and a quick decision to boot.

Your Body, My Choice

This is the mantra that flooded X after the 2024 election, and while I hate almost everything about it, the thing I love is that it makes it crystal clear that the agenda is NOT "pro-life" or even "pro-birth" (because afterall, the GOP agenda is about not supporting life after birth), it is about power and control over women. Period. Any talk of when life begins and what various religions might and might not support or prohibit is just a distraction, a way to put a pretty bow on an ugly message, which is that men who are attracted to the GOP messaging want to have power and control over women. No wonder it is causing trouble in people's homes. Nobody wants to be a slave to anybody, and the impulse to control people is in itself very unattractive. But at least now it is out there on the table for all to see. This is what you voted for and this is what you want. Is it any wonder that many of us are upset to find out that over half the voting public wants this?

Happy Halloween! An estimated 67% of Americans will give out candy today, according to the National Retail Federation. Tomorrow is the day that those who celebrate will venerate their dead, followed by turning our clocks back an hour on Sunday, and voting on Tuesday, where hopefully we will not turn the damn country back a 100 years or more. 1. Election countdown With five days until Election Day, former President Donald Trump and Vice President Kamala Harris both have viable paths to the White House. Polls show the race is neck and neck — and could be decided by small numbers of voters in a single battleground state. The candidates are focusing on seven key states in their final campaign sprint: Pennsylvania, Michigan, Wisconsin, Arizona, Nevada, North Carolina and Georgia. Trump was in Wisconsin on Wednesday, where he broke out the props and seized on a garbled remark by President Joe Biden that seemed to insult Trump voters as “garbage.” Biden has denied calling Trump supporters “garbage,” saying his comment on a call Tuesday had been misinterpreted. 2. It's The Economy Several economists and officials have told CNN the economy has finally pulled off a soft landing, in which inflation is tamed without a recession — an exceptionally rare achievement. Gross domestic product, which measures all the goods and services produced in the economy, expanded at an annualized rate of 2.8% in the third quarter, the Commerce Department said Wednesday. That’s a slightly weaker pace than the second quarter’s 3% rate and above the 2.6% rate economists projected in a FactSet poll. Wednesday’s report comes after earlier data showed the economy added a whopping 254,000 jobs in September, inflation is a whisper away from the Federal Reserve’s 2% target and consumer confidence jumped this month by the fastest clip since March of 2021 — all signs of a robust economy. The bad news is that this doesn't seem to sway voters, but it will make the initial path for the next president easier. 3. Extreme weather At least 95 people have been killed by severe flash floods in Spain, according to authorities on Wednesday, as emergency responders scramble to find dozens of missing people. In the worst-affected region of Valencia, 92 people were killed and around 1,200 are thought to still be trapped, local officials said. Separately, Taiwan’s largest storm since 1996 made landfall today with heavy rains and damaging winds equivalent to a Category 3 Atlantic hurricane. The storm, known as Typhoon Kong-rey, has killed at least one person and injured dozens of others. This will be a task for the next administration to face--will they be up to it? So have fun today because the next week gets very scary indeed.

Never Forget

September 11th, 2001 We were like everyone else--maybe more aware because we were not at work--glued to the television, watching planes hit one then the other tower of the WTC in New York City. It was a shocking event and all Americans remember what they were doing that day--the similar day for me was Kennedy's assasination, but I remember it because cartoons were cancelled the day after he was shot and that was what my 4 year old self was struck by. In addition to what everyone was feeling, I was also watching my youngest son get his last dose of chemotherapy. He had been diagnosed with a malignant brain tumor 15 months before, and had undergone surgery, radiation, followed by a grueling year of chemotherapy. I was, and remain, grateful for the medical care he received as well as the research that went on before his diagnosis to give him the chance at living beyond 5 years old, but it was the hardest thing that I have ever done. The terrosit attacks on our country cut short any sort of celebration that was planned to mark the momentous day, but in some ways that turned out to be fitting. When treatment ended so too ended the prolonged periods of compromised immunity, bloow transfusions, deadly infections, and prolonged hours in the hospital, but it began what every family who has had a family member survive cancer--the waiting period. The time is fraught with anxiety, and almost nobody gets it. The general public thinks the hard part is over, and it is true that the physically grueling part is (hopefully) behind you--but the emotionally draining part continues. So today we celebrate the 23 year anniversary of a successful end of cancer treatment.

Disillusioned by Benjamin Herold

This book follows five families from five different parts of the country addressing the trials and tribulations associated with disappointment with living in the suburbs in the United States. These are families of color that sought comfort and promise in America’s suburbs over these past couple of decades, they live outside these metropolis': Chicago, Atlanta, Dallas, Los Angeles, and Pittsburgh. In each of these communities, he zeroes in on the schools, in large part because education captures the essence of what attracted these families: the prospect of something better for their kids was a primary motivator for moving, and how their expectations were not met with the reality. This is a sprawling book, which is its virtue and the source of its occasional misfires. Five families are a lot to keep track of. I found myself confused at times, and not sure that other than the good geographic distribution they are all needed as the stories have a lot of overlap. Finally, here’s someone to take us to the places that early on served as an escape valve, mostly for white families fleeing the changing demographics of urban America, the places where many Americans imagined a kind of social and economic utopia. The crux of the matter is that suburbs were largely designed to accommodate white families who wanted to step back in time and avoid a changing social structure, and that is not a place designed for all people.

Everyone Who Is Gone Is Here by Jonathan Blitzer

This is a sweeping, all-inclusive investigative reporter style book about Central America, immigration, and the United States. While politicians in general and the GOP especially characterize this as a problem at best and a humanitarian crisis at worst that is of Central America's making, the truth is that we are the alpha and the omega of the issue. We are the beginning because we have chronically interfered in the politics, the government, and the economics of Central America and then we are the end because much of what is driving violence in the region is drugs and those drugs are coming to the United States, and then also because we are seen as the promised land, where all will be solved, and as we know that is truly never the case. Only Fox News makes the life of the immigrant seem unduly idle and rewarded, and that is solely for the purposes of fanning the flames of fury against brown skinned people, not that they believe it to be true. The story is overly long and complex, and perhaps by necessity, so is this book. The tentacles of United States businesses in Central America is so widespread as to be hard to believe. "How did this happen" would be a reasonable question that is largely not answered and too big for the scope of the book, which is already sweeping. Unfortunately sometimes the most important message, which is that the Trump administration with the white supremacist Steven Miller at the helm, did unspeakable things to immigrant families for money, political power, and probably no small amount of sadistic pleasure, and at some point, we need to really try to fix the enormous problem that we have no small part in creating rather than pointing fingers of blame elsewhere, and have the expectation that it will only marginally improve because we have made such a mess of it.

The Burial (2023)

I think when all is said and done that this is a better storty than it is a movie. Here's the story--a southern gentleman who has a string of family owned funeral homes is in deep financial trouble because he made some bad investment choices, lost a lot of money, and while he avoided going to jail, the person he invested with did not, and he lost not just his money but also other peoples. He had thirteen kids and he is trying to save the business he inherited from his father so that he can pass something on to his kids. So his lawyer, who is unlikable in the movie and probably in real life, a privledged southern good old boy who wears his racism front and center, hooks him up with a flashy potential buyer of three of his nine funeral homes, so that he will again be liquid, not loose his ability to sell funeral insurance, which is where he makes most of his money, and all looks to be good except for one thing. The big corporate saviour doesn't sign the contract, and drags everything out so that the southern gentleman is in danger of loosing it all. He doesn't see it coming, but his son's friend, a young black freshly minted lawyer does and they decide to get a flashy attorney and take on corporate America. You see where this is going, and really this is not a spoiler because you can see it coming a mile away. It is a'90s inspirational courtroom drama pitched to extreme comedy, and it comes as simple and sweet as a cool summer breeze when flashy personal injury lawyer Willie E. Gary (Jamie Foxx) arrives in Mississippi to defend the mild-mannered Jeremiah O’Keefe (Tommy Lee Jones). These two heavy hitters portray both a battle and a friendship that warms the heart, even if there are no surprises.

Democracy's Data by Dan Bouk

This is yet another look at the systemic racism in the United States--the book focuses on the 1940 census for some in-depth reporting but has a sub-text of the whole process of the census. It this is a powerful bit of protest against centuries of Black people being misidentified, undercounted and downright erased from the public record. The author is a historian who has also studied computational mathematics, and he believes passionately in the ideals of the census, but reveals in abundant detail how badly it has failed society. Native Americans were long excluded and ethnic classification abetted among other horrors the roundup of Japanese Americans to internment camps and the deportation of Mexican immigrants. In theory, counting the population seems so basic, so neutral: a math problem that requires meticulous attention to detail. But the numerical is political, with representation and resources at stake, so of course it has been manipulated. Bouk shows how, from its beginnings, the census has been subject to partisan interests, which continues up to and including the last census. I am reminded of the quote that democracy is the worst form of government, except for all the rest. It is a messy business when you look at it closely and it is miraculous that it works at all.

The Freedom of Privacy

I came of age in what was apparently a golden age of women being near equal citizens to men in the United States. The Supreme Court, illigitimately composed by the GOP voted to overturn Roe vs. Wade, saying that it was a 50 year long mistake that needed rectifying by a majority that includes a rapist, a sexual harrassing misogynist who's wife should be prosecuted for plotting the overthrow of the government, liars all at their confirmation hearings. It is gauling and appalling that my granddaughter's face more restrictions than I did. The Handmaid's Tale was actually a blueprint for the future that the current SCOTUS took to heart to make a reality rather than a work of fiction. What remains to be seen is what will voters do about it. We already know that Republicans are surpressing the ability of black and brown people to vite, and that they control state government in many states, even purple ones. So in order to turn the tide against this tyranny, it will take overwhelming nmumbers of people who do not usually vote to trun out. Will this and the January 6th inquiries light that kind of fire under voters at the midterm elections? I hope and pray they do, because it really an emergency. I am so very angry. Who will join me?